Categories
Info

Major Asset Purchase Terms

Deal Summary
Filing Date:
Mar 8, 2021 – Mar 9, 2021
Agreement Date:
Mar 8, 2021
Deal Structure:
Standard Asset Purchase / Sale
Subsidiary or Business Division Sale
Equity Purchase
Deal Size:
$66M
Transaction Status:
Pending
Consideration Type:
Cash
Combination
Earnout
Law Firms:
White & Case
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney
Financial Firms:
B Riley & Co LLC
Roth Capital Partners LLC
Governing Law:
Delaware
Purchase Price:
Earn-out
Earn-out – Metric – Revenue
Earn-out – Period
Escrow Type – General Escrow – $4.95M
Purchase Price Adjustment
Purchase Price Adjustment – Metric – Cash
Representations and Warranties:
Financial Statements – Fairly Presented
Financial Statements – GAAP Qualified
No Undisclosed Liabilities – GAAP Requirement – GAAP
Tax Matters
Covenants:
Antitrust Approval Risk Shifting
Conditions:
Bring Down of Reps and Warranties – Materiality Qualifier
Indemnification:
Indemnification – Limitations
Indemnification – Mini-Basket
Indemnification – Sandbagging – Pro
Indemnification – Survival Periods – Fundamental
Indemnification – Survival Periods – General
Indemnification – Survival Periods – Special
Indemnification – Survival Periods – Special
Indemnification – Survival Periods – Special

Categories
Corporate Law Info

Document retention policy

ESI Policy How to develop a records inventory, take special care to review and understand where and how electronically stored information (“ESI”) sits on any client’s systems. This process (often referred to as “data mapping”) may be performed by in-house IT personnel with or without assistance from outside consultants. In-house counsel also should be involved […]

Categories
Agreements Info Uncategorized

Buying a video game company

On February 19, 2021, Motorsport Games Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), entered into a binding term sheet (the “Binding Term Sheet”) with Black Delta Holdings PTY, Black Delta Trading Pty Ltd and Black Delta IP Pty Ltd (collectively, “Black Delta”).

Pursuant to the Binding Term Sheet, the Company and Black Delta intend that the Company will acquire from Black Delta all assets related to the KartKraft Game (the “Target Assets”). The purchase price for the Target Assets will be U.S. $1,000,000, (exclusive of Australian goods and services tax) payable in two installments, as follows: U.S. $750,000 at closing and U.S. $250,000 on the six-month anniversary of closing.

Categories
Info Litigation Uncategorized

word cloud feature detection on successful motions

A successful class certification! Rule 23. Class Actions (a) Prerequisites. One or more members of a class may sue or be sued as representative parties on behalf of all members only if: (1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the […]

Categories
Info

Motion for Summary Judgment Tabiya

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1
BACKGROUND ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3
PARTIES AND STANDING …………………………………………………………………………………………… 9
STANDARD OF REVIEW……………………………………………………………………………………………. 10
ARGUMENT……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 11
I. EPA HAS DETERMINED THAT REVISED HUMAN HEALTH
WATER QUALITY STANDARDS BASED UPON A CORRECTED
FISH CONSUMPTION RATE ARE NECESSARY TO MEET THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT. ………………………………….. 11
II. EPA‟S DETERMINATION TRIGGERED A MANDATORY DUTY
FOR EPA TO PROMULGATE THE REVISED STANDARD BY
DECEMBER 14, 2015, AND EPA IS IN VIOLATION OF THAT DUTY…….. 12
III. WATERKEEPERS WASHINGTON REQUESTS AN ORDER
DIRECTING EPA TO ACT WITHIN A SET TIME……………………………………. 14
CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 15
Case 2:16-cv-00293-JLR Document 4 Filed 03/01/16 Page 2 of 22
PLAINTIFFS‟ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THERETO
(No. 2:16-cv-00293-JLR) -ii
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
CASES PAGE(S)
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby,
477 U.S. 242 (1986)…………………………………………………………………………………………………..10
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett,
477 U.S. 317 (1986)…………………………………………………………………………………………………..10
Fund for Animals, Inc. v. Espy,
814 F. Supp. 142 (D.D.C. 1993)………………………………………………………………………………….15
Idaho Conservation League, Inc., v. Russell,
946 F.2d 717 (9th Cir. 1991) ………………………………………………………………………………………13
Nw. Envtl. Advocates v. EPA,
268 F. Supp. 2d 1255 (D. Or. 2003) ……………………………………………………………………….12, 13
Puget Soundkeeper All. v. U.S. E.P.A.,
No. C13-1839-JCC, 2014 WL 4674393 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 18, 2014)……………………………..13
Raymond Proffitt Found. v. EPA,
930 F. Supp. 1088 (E.D. Pa. 1996)………………………………………………………………………………13
U.S. v. Akers,
785 F.2d 814 (9th Cir. 1986) …………………………………………………………………………………14, 15
Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo,
456 U.S. 305 (1982)…………………………………………………………………………………………………..14
STATUTES
33 U.S.C. § 1251(a) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3
33 U.S.C. § 1313………………………………………………………………………………………………….13, 14, 15
33 U.S.C. § 1313(a) and (b)……………………………………………………………………………………………….3
33 U.S.C. § 1313(c)(4)…………………………………………………………………………………………….. passim
33 U.S.C. § 1365…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….15
33 U.S.C. § 1365(a)(2)………………………………………………………………………………………………………9
OTHER AUTHORITIES
40 C.F.R. § 130.3……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..3
Case 2:16-cv-00293-JLR Document 4 Filed 03/01/16 Page 3 of 22
PLAINTIFFS‟ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THERETO
(No. 2:16-cv-00293-JLR) -iii
40 C.F.R. § 131.4……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..3
40 C.F.R. § 131.5……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..3
40 C.F.R. § 130.10……………………………………………………………………………………………………………3
40 C.F.R. § 131.11……………………………………………………………………………………………………………3
40 C.F.R. § 131.20……………………………………………………………………………………………………………3
40 C.F.R. § 131.21……………………………………………………………………………………………………………3
40 C.F.R. § 131.22(b) ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..12
40 C.F.R. § 131.36…………………………………………………………………………………………………….4, 5, 7
80 Fed. Reg. 55,063 (Sept. 14, 2015) ………………………………………………………………………… passim
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c) ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….10
Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure …………………………………………………………………………..1
Wash. Admin. Code. § 173-201A-240(5) (2011)………………………………………………………………….4

Categories
Info

Good brief by Microsoft

This is copypasta of what a winning summary judgment motion looks like.   It is intended to be a seed database for training algorithms to detect ‘successful’ features of litigation paperwork.  It is intended to be machine readable less than human readable.  The original is accessible via this link: here.     FILED 12 SEP […]

Categories
Info Litigation Services

Brazen Bootleggers – Pirates and Publishers

Are you an artist who wants to protect an “original work of authorship”?  This can be any work including literary, technical, musical, artistic, dramatic, and other works, both published and unpublished, that are fixed in a tangible medium. What’s protected is the fixed expression of an idea or fact – it’s not the underlying idea, […]

Categories
Info Litigation Services

Breach! Indemnity & Unjust Enrichment

3…. 2…. Is your business ready to launch? Click Here IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTONIN AND FOR KING COUNTY MINT MONEY MORTGAGE COMPANY d/b/a/ Mint Home Loans, a Washington corporation,Plaintiff,v.Plentom AGENCY, INC. d/b/a Plentom FSB, a New Jersey corporation Defendant; COMES NOW the above-captioned· Plaintiff, Mint Money Mortgage Company d/b/a Mint […]

Categories
Agreements Info

Master Equipment Lease

Have a question about your company’s master lease agreement? 3…. 2…. Is your business ready to launch? Click Here LESSOR MASTER EQUIPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT [GRAPHIC] MASTER LEASE AGREEMENT NO. __________ Lease Agreement made this                      day of                     ,                      between EQUATORIAL PACIFIC LEASING CORPORATION, dba. YO MOMMA CAPITAL EQUATORIAL PACIFIC LEASING (“Lessor”) with a place of business located at 13010 […]

Categories
Agreements Info Services

Exclusive Distribution Agreement

Things getting a little exclusive? 3…. 2…. Is your business ready to launch? Click Here EXCLUSIVE DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) dated October 11, 2020 among R. T. GOULD COMPANY, INC. and GOULD INTERNATIONAL, Sarl, corporations having an office at 30 Winfield Street, Norwalk, Connecticut, U.S.A. (“GOULD”); and Platinum Research Organization, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, having an […]